I’ve been having some great conversations with teachers in my school about final evaluations in high school courses (i.e. exams and final culminating tasks). I see a desperate need for the discussion, so I’m hoping this might be a place for some of it. To that end, I’m sharing some of the points people having been making.
First, some context
When two or more teachers in a school have sections of the same course, they’re encouraged to collaborate throughout the courses and are required to have consistency in the way their final 30% is evaluated. For example, if one teacher has a large culminating task for the entire 30%, another teacher of the same course shouldn’t have a 30% formal “test” exam.
This is true in lots of schools all over Ontario. It’s not a provincial policy, but it’s a very common board/school/departmental policy.
Thoughts I’ve had and heard
These are some of the points I’ve heard about this approach in no particular order. I’ll use the term “exam” to refer to any tool that is used for the final 30% component of a student’s grade, whether it’s a test, assignment, presentation, research paper, performance, etc.
- If you have a formal exam and I have a task, students won’t get consistent marks, which matters for post-secondary entrance/scholarships.
- How is it different from one teacher being a “hard marker” and the other teacher being an “easy marker”? Isn’t that a bigger problem?
- If two siblings are evaluated differently, parents and siblings will all be upset that it’s not equal.
- Two teachers in different schools/boards don’t have to align their exams; why is it required within a school?
- You’re more likely to have a consistent mark distribution if you use the same exams.
- Teachers should have autonomy and be permitted professional judgement as long as they’re following curriculum, Growing Success, and other policies.
- Students need to write formal exams to prepare for university, so there shouldn’t be other forms of exams in grade 12, especially for U courses.
- The exam is only worth 30%. The 70% term work is more valuable, but the policy doesn’t apply to it.
- If you say my exam is easier than another teacher’s exam, you’re implying that one of us is inaccurately evaluating student understanding and performance.
- There is no standard for the “amount of work” a student has to do for an exam.
- We should have provincially standardized exams for senior courses for consistency and equity.
- An open-book exam is easier than a closed-book exam.
- An open-book exam is harder than a closed-book exam.
- Some students need accommodations because of learning disabilities. Is it okay to give a different form of the exam for those students? Can’t other students access the same accommodations, since they aren’t modifications?
- If school administration would approve of both exams on their own, then two teachers should be able to have different exams at the same time.
- Not all forms of evidence of student learning are equally valid or accurate.
- If I come to a school for semester 2, why am I restricted by what a semester 1 teacher chose to do in their class?
What do you think?
Post some comments. Let’s work on this together.