Apparently the EU has decided eBooks should be taxed as services (link) instead of goods (like physical books).
I don’t think it’s that simple.
When Digital Products Are Services
eBook “retailers” like Amazon are essentially offering you a licence to access a digital product, not ownership of a copy of the product.
Of course, their casual wording might lead you to believe otherwise:
But you’ve purchased a licence, not a book.
Compare it to NetFlix. You pay a monthly fee to access a library of digital content. It happens to be the same library everyone else gets too, not a customized library. We are more comfortable with the idea of subscription because we aren’t picking specific movies, and we even expect that some titles will disappear.
These are services – the companies sell access, not goods.
When Digital Products Are Goods
When I buy a book from Humble Bundle or Baen though, I’m buying a book (aren’t I?). I’m allowed to use it in certain ways (e.g. on multiple devices), and they’re not able to revoke my licence (I don’t think). There is no DRM to lock me into a platform or a service, and the expectation is that I will manage my purchases honestly and appropriately.
And I’m glad they provide the ability to download my books at any time, but I don’t expect them to maintain my library for me. I keep my local copies, just in case.
I’m certainly thinking of an eBook as a thing I’m buying, not a licence I’m buying. I want permanent access.
Can’t the Retailer and/or Publisher Choose?
I think there is room for both types of access, but it’s currently not clear to the consumer what they’re paying for.
It would be nice for the publisher, or possibly the publisher and retailer together, to decide whether they’re licensing or selling (or both), and then price differentially and accordingly.
I have no legal training. I’m just making lay observations, so don’t interpret any of this as legal advice, silly.